The Shadow Negotiator: Michel Cojot and the Entebbe Rescue
A new documentary excavates the overlooked role of a Holocaust survivor who became a pivotal intelligence asset during the 1976 Entebbe hostage crisis.

In a significant development that highlights the complex intersection of privacy, technology, and consumer rights, Apple has agreed to a $95 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit over allegations that its voice assistant, Siri, was improperly recording users’ private conversations.
This settlement could potentially benefit millions of Apple device owners who have used Siri-enabled products since 2014.
The crux of the lawsuit, Lopez v. Apple Inc., revolves around claims that Apple’s Siri, designed to be activated by the voice command “Hey, Siri,” was inadvertently recording conversations without users’ consent.
These unintended activations allegedly resulted in the unauthorized sharing of private information with third parties, including advertisers.
The plaintiffs in the case reported instances where they saw advertisements related to topics they had only discussed verbally, raising concerns about privacy and data security.
Apple, while agreeing to the settlement, has denied any wrongdoing.
The company maintains that the data sharing was limited and aimed at improving Siri’s performance and dictation capabilities.
However, the lawsuit cites a 2019 investigative report by The Guardian, which revealed that third-party contractors working for Apple had access to confidential user information.
This report played a pivotal role in highlighting potential privacy breaches and fueled the legal proceedings against the tech giant.
For Apple device users who feel their privacy may have been compromised, this settlement represents not just financial compensation but also a broader acknowledgment of the need for heightened privacy protections in the digital age.
Those who owned or purchased Siri-enabled devices in the U.S. between September 17, 2014, and December 31, 2024, and experienced unintended Siri activations during private conversations are eligible to file claims.
Each valid claim could yield up to $20 per device, though the final amount may vary based on the number of claims filed.
Submitting a claim is a relatively straightforward process.
Eligible device owners have until July 2, 2025, to file their claims online.
Some individuals might have already received notification via email or postcard, complete with a claim identification code to facilitate the process.
However, even without these codes, eligible users can still submit their claims through the designated settlement website.
For those who wish to opt out or object to the settlement, these options are available, although the specifics of such actions would depend on legal advice.
This settlement raises important questions about the balance between technological innovation and user privacy.
As tech companies continue to develop more sophisticated voice-activated devices, they must grapple with ensuring these technologies do not infringe on users’ privacy rights.
The case against Apple underscores the growing scrutiny that tech giants face regarding how they handle user data and the importance of transparency in these processes.
In the broader landscape, this case also reflects a shift in consumer awareness and activism.
Users are becoming increasingly vigilant about their digital rights and are more willing to hold companies accountable when they feel those rights are violated.
This trend is likely to continue, prompting tech companies to reevaluate their privacy policies and data handling practices.
Moreover, the settlement could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
As voice-activated technology becomes more integrated into everyday life, other companies may face similar scrutiny and legal challenges.
This could potentially lead to more rigorous privacy standards across the industry, benefiting consumers in the long run.
For now, the next steps involve a final approval hearing scheduled for August 1.
Should the settlement receive approval, payments to claimants will begin processing shortly thereafter, barring any appeals.
This timeline remains tentative, with updates available on the settlement website for those interested in tracking the progress.
In conclusion, while the $95 million settlement represents a significant financial commitment from Apple, its implications extend far beyond monetary value.
It serves as a reminder of the ongoing dialogue between technological advancement and privacy rights, highlighting the need for vigilance and accountability in the digital age.
As consumers, staying informed and proactive about our digital rights remains crucial as we navigate this rapidly evolving landscape.
A new documentary excavates the overlooked role of a Holocaust survivor who became a pivotal intelligence asset during the 1976 Entebbe hostage crisis.
The BusinessDay technology lead joins a cohort of West African journalists to refine investigative reporting on science and innovation.
A deep dive into the corporate histories and legal records of Krishan Rattan and Ankiti Bose reveals a complex reality behind their high-profile investment platform.