The Shadow Negotiator: Michel Cojot and the Entebbe Rescue
A new documentary excavates the overlooked role of a Holocaust survivor who became a pivotal intelligence asset during the 1976 Entebbe hostage crisis.

The digital landscape is a constantly shifting terrain, and even the most foundational elements of our online lives are not immune to evolution.
This week, a significant tremor rippled through the world of email, as Google, the titan behind Gmail, announced a decisive move set to reshape how millions access their third-party messages.
Beginning January 1, 2026, Gmail will cease supporting the Post Office Protocol (POP), effectively ending a long-standing method of email retrieval for countless users.
It’s a change that, while seemingly technical, underscores a deeper, more critical shift towards a more secure, albeit sometimes less convenient, internet.
For years, POP, particularly its more common iteration POP3, has been the quiet workhorse of email. Its premise is elegantly simple: an email client application connects to a remote mail server, authenticates with a username and password, and downloads new messages directly to the user’s device. This protocol offered a straightforward way for individuals to consolidate multiple email accounts from various providers into a single, unified inbox, a feature that Gmail itself integrated, much to the convenience of its vast user base.
It was a testament to the early internet’s design philosophy – prioritize functionality, sometimes at the expense of robust security.
But the digital world of the early 2000s is a stark contrast to today’s interconnected, threat-laden environment.
Google’s rationale for deprecating POP support is unequivocally rooted in security, a necessity that has become the paramount concern for any major online platform. The primary vulnerability of POP, a protocol conceived in a simpler era, lies in its default transmission of data, including sensitive usernames, passwords, and the email content itself, in plaintext. This unencrypted transfer is an open invitation for malicious actors, leaving a gaping hole in a user’s digital defenses.
Furthermore, POP lacks inherent support for modern security staples like two-factor authentication (2FA), a critical layer of protection against unauthorized access.
“These changes help provide the most secure and current options to access your messages in Gmail,” Google stated, a succinct but powerful declaration that speaks volumes about the company’s commitment to raising the bar for user safety. While Google often issues warnings about ongoing hacking threats, it is far less common for the company to fundamentally dismantle a core feature due to inherent security flaws. This isn’t a patch; it’s a surgical removal, a clear signal that the era of legacy, insecure protocols is rapidly drawing to a close.
The good news for those currently relying on POP for their third-party emails is that a robust and secure alternative already exists and is fully supported by Gmail: the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP). Unlike POP, which typically downloads and removes emails from the server, IMAP keeps messages on the server, allowing for seamless synchronization across multiple devices. Crucially, IMAP is designed with modern security in mind, offering encrypted communication and better integration with advanced authentication methods.
Google has advised all users currently utilizing POP3 for third-party accounts to transition to IMAP access as soon as possible, urging them to consult their respective email providers for specific instructions on enabling IMAP.
This shift isn’t just about Google pushing a new standard; it’s about the collective responsibility of users to embrace better digital hygiene. In a world where data breaches are a weekly headline, clinging to outdated, vulnerable protocols is an increasingly untenable position. While the January 2026 deadline might seem distant, the company’s implicit message is clear: the time to act is now, to ensure uninterrupted email delivery and, more importantly, enhanced security.
It’s also important to note that this change doesn’t mean the end of using other email services like Yahoo! or Microsoft Outlook with Gmail entirely. Users will still be able to integrate these accounts directly into the Gmail app on their Android or iPhone devices, a testament to the platform’s adaptability and continued commitment to offering a centralized email experience. Furthermore, any emails already synced to Gmail before the 2026 deprecation date will remain securely in place, assuaging fears of data loss.
Ultimately, Google’s decision, while potentially disruptive for a segment of its user base, is a necessary and prudent step in the ongoing battle for digital security. It serves as a potent reminder that the digital infrastructure we rely on is not static. It demands constant vigilance, adaptation, and sometimes, the difficult but essential act of retiring old technologies that no longer meet the evolving demands of a secure online world.
For users, it’s a gentle but firm nudge towards a safer future, one where convenience is increasingly tempered with an unyielding commitment to protection. The message is clear: evolve or risk being left behind in a less secure past.
A new documentary excavates the overlooked role of a Holocaust survivor who became a pivotal intelligence asset during the 1976 Entebbe hostage crisis.
New research highlights how opportunistic infostealer malware is exploiting browser-based password managers to compromise corporate credentials at an unprecedented scale.
A deep dive into the corporate histories and legal records of Krishan Rattan and Ankiti Bose reveals a complex reality behind their high-profile investment platform.